Nathan Ponwith vs Bjorn Swenson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W L L
Form
W W W L W L W L W LHead To Head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Swenson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Swenson winning 1. The last match between Ponwith and Swenson was at the M15 Ann Arbor, 03-10-2024, Second, Hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nathan Ponwith | 1 |
| Bjorn Swenson | 0 |
M15 Ann Arbor(03-10-2024)
4
6
6
3
7
6
| Ponwith | Stats | Swenson |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (5-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 816 | Ranking | N/A |
| 367 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (184-159) | Career Total W/L | 53% (18-16) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Bjorn Swenson
54%
(
61 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:7:0 | Average Match Time | 3:7:0 |
| 54% (61/112) | 1st Serve % | 63% (60/96) |
| 70% (43/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (37/60) |
| 45% (23/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (21/36) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 40% (38/96) | Return Points Win % | 41% (46/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
Nathan Ponwith
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ian Mayew
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Nathan Ponwith
42%
(
33 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Zhu
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Nathan Ponwith
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
74 of
125)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bjorn Swenson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Bjorn Swenson
54%
(
61 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Swenson
Player
Taha Baadi
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pranav Kumar
Player
Bjorn Swenson
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jerry Roddick
Player
Bjorn Swenson
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Arda Azkara
Player
Bjorn Swenson
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Swenson
Player
Felix Corwin
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-1 16-14 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (184/159) | Win/Loss | 53% (18/16) |
| 53% (416/374) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (39/35) |
| 51% (3783/3604) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (356/336) |
| 55% (135/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) |
| 57% (39/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 37% (10/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 709 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 901 | Total Double Faults | 57 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 395.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 327.79 |
| 57% (9558/16694) | 1st Serve % | 65% (674/1035) |
| 67% (6358/9558) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (442/674) |
| 50% (3535/7136) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (162/361) |
| 41% (666/1616) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (49/100) |
| 39% (6392/16380) | Return Points Win % | 41% (409/1004) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (20/48) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (164/111) | Futures W/L | 53% (18/16) |
| 54% (183/341) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (38/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 53% (56/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 83% (187/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (19/16) |
| 17% (187/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (19/3) |
| 18% (156/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (15/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
